Free Essay on Ecology of a Cracker Childhood :: Cracker

Free Essay on bionomics of a redneck Childhood By reading Ecology of a Cracker Childhood, it is safe to assume that Janisse light beam, the main character, author, is one who doesnt conform and has a cantankerous nature. For instance, when Ray wants to fill football with the boys in her class at recess she gets angered when they tell her no she can not play with them so kind of of accepting their reaction she jumps in the game anyway and tackles the boy with the football. The boys angry with the fact that their friend, a guy, got tackled by a girl went chasing after her. Why did Ray feel the take aim to make a statement by taking down the boy with the football? Perhaps it was her feminist nature, driving her to show the boys that tho because she was a female person didnt mean that she was not able to do as they did. Whether or not it was feminism, Ray, still has the heart of a revolutionary. Ray suspected that the boys rejection was collect to the fact that she was a girl, but her suspicions were repudiated when she saw a girl playing with them. The only difference between Janisse and the other girl was that the other girl was not wearing a dress. The Ray familys religious convictions required the females of the family to wear a dress, providing for the boys uneasiness when it came down to allowing her to play with them. Janisse, dress or not, felt capable of partaking in the sport. It is women homogeneous Ray, who impart not take no for an answer, that has brought equal rights to their gender in sports, jobs and even around the house. America was founded, and has been very successful because of people like Ray, who want to have their backgrounds or use them to learn from them in order to better their lives in the future the kind of people that go out do anything, whether it is going their homeland for a foreign soil in search of a new life and freedom, or tackling the boy with the football. Things have been changed, invented, and made better by people that will not take no for an answer.Free Essay on Ecology of a Cracker Childhood Cracker Free Essay on Ecology of a Cracker Childhood By reading Ecology of a Cracker Childhood, it is safe to assume that Janisse Ray, the main character, author, is one who doesnt conform and has a stubborn nature. For instance, when Ray wants to play football with the boys in her class at recess she gets angered when they tell her no she can not play with them so instead of accepting their reply she jumps in the game anyway and tackles the boy with the football. The boys angry with the fact that their friend, a guy, got tackled by a girl went chasing after her. Why did Ray feel the need to make a statement by taking down the boy with the football? Perhaps it was her feminist nature, driving her to show the boys that just because she was a female didnt mean that she was not able to do as they did. Whether or not it was feminism, Ray, still has the he art of a revolutionary. Ray suspected that the boys rejection was due to the fact that she was a girl, but her suspicions were repudiated when she saw a girl playing with them. The only difference between Janisse and the other girl was that the other girl was not wearing a dress. The Ray familys religious convictions required the females of the family to wear a dress, providing for the boys uneasiness when it came down to allowing her to play with them. Janisse, dress or not, felt capable of partaking in the sport. It is women like Ray, who will not take no for an answer, that has brought equal rights to their gender in sports, jobs and even around the house. America was founded, and has been very successful because of people like Ray, who want to leave their backgrounds or use them to learn from them in order to better their lives in the future the kind of people that will do anything, whether it is leaving their homeland for a foreign soil in search of a new life a nd freedom, or tackling the boy with the football. Things have been changed, invented, and made better by people that will not take no for an answer.