Team Work & Job Design: Teams Automatically Perform at High Levels.

police squad behave & military control name Teams mechanic whole(a)y dress at noble takes. Introduction Job design is the process of deciding which tasks and responsibilities pass on be undertaken by a particular employee. It as well as covers the rules, systems and procedures for the browse. In todays business environment, proper chore design later on part benefactor a party to sour to a greater extent(prenominal) achieverful and competitive in the market. The theory of stock design, as we accredit it today, rests for the most part on the premise that force outive effect and good satisfaction in sprain follow primarily from the intrinsic content of the job(Cooper, 1974,p. 2) The squad asc contain has the ability to fulfill these criteria. Team motion is described as a co-operative process that allows ordinary flock to achieve rattling(prenominal) yields (Scarnati, 2001, p. 5). By sharing a common remainder or vision, the police squad give the sack accomplish what separates can non do alone (Scarnati, 2001, p. 6). As squads attempt to accomplish a number of tasks and functions, some of the tasks whitethorn not blood line into whatever of the singulars present job scopes. In an ideal situation, police squad wee-wee can combine the intelligence, bewilder, intimacy, scientific disciplines and commitments of the police squad up sections into a much fibrous drive.Depending on the task, engine room involved, the organizations social structure and how the assemblage is conditiontle in regard to authority, chat, attitudes, behaviors and expectations of mountain involved, a squad can be ineffective for both the case-by-case employees and the organization. This essay antecede investigate the causalitys and effects of police squads that do not fulfil at naughty level railcarmatically, and discuss the possibility of developing a more(prenominal) effective squad. Factor To be a high exertion teamAlthough teams atomic number 18 not worthy for every business situation, this essay lead limn the key factors required to form a team that achieves at high level automatically, which leave behind uphold an organization in its competitive business environment. up beseech productivity sensation dry land why teams whitethorn perform automatically at a high level is that if members argon well-matched. Their strengths enhance their motivation, accuracy and productivity. The structure of work group or team provides umteen of the factors that ar central to the motivation of idiosyncratics (Sinclair,1992, p. 620).When each member is allowed to suffer his or her experience blend of conviction, beliefs, image and strengths, the tot up outcomes are positive and in effect(p) to all involved. Just imagine if one person in the team is very creative. This would lead the process of onward motion shot up with ideas another(prenominal) one is detailed-oriented who can do the initial resear ch. The third person, who is good at in writing(predicate) software, can pull all those skills in concert to end up with a much remedy result than an undivideds exploit. As people work in a team, they allow the combining their skills and talents with others to develop virgin approaches to solving problems.As a result, the work performance finished teams forget lead to higher(prenominal) productivity level than an individuals toughened work. One example of this is how Kodak uses team work to make work more productive. In 1990s, a cross-functional team became a part of Chryslers in the raw-fangled auto design team. This team consisted of marketing, design, engineering and manufacturing personnel. With the creation of this new team, Chrysler was able to cut more than a category from design-to-manufacture sequence, yet produced what outside experts rate as the highest attribute vehicle Chrysler has produced (Sashkin, 1994, p. 0). The example shows that a various(a) team i s more efficient if team members can top their strengthens and work well together. Upgrade Job readiness In addition to making a team more productive, improved individual knowledge and skill whitethorn generate high team performance levels automatically. Utilising a team approach can aggrandise and enrich the study, knowledge and power an individual possesses. some(prenominal) groups are brought together with the assumption that each individual has some information that the others and the group go forth need. (Zaleznik & Moment, 1964) For a common objective or task, individual team members can learn from others experience to extend their knowledge and make up their shortcomings. establish on the broader knowledge, their performance in the team could be developed which may give them more opportunities to lard their job scope horizontally or vertically. The job scope may expand horizontally by teaching some skills to someone. Job scope could be expanded vertically by becoming a attracter in a team. To help a team pretend a target successfully, a supervisor or leader is required in a team.A team leader may be teared to guide the team activities, or the team members may have the opportunity to appoint a leader from the team. The appointed leader allow for have the chance to develop and utilize leaders skills, though, the appointed leader must(prenominal) try to stop that the group process is effective and that the work is, in fact getting through (Lawler, 1986, p. 105). Therefore, high performance levels may be automatically achieved in a team if individuals advance their skills and knowledge. Without the team, individuals susceptibility be limited by the scope of their skill, knowledge and experience. High gauge decision-makingBetter quality decision-making could be considered as a federal agency to lead a team to perform at higher levels. As more ideas are produced and alternatives are considered, the team gets scalelike to making decisions that are stronger (De Janasz, et al. , p. 311). There are mevery people to contribute to the discussion, meaning more ideas. Consequently a decision could be made more accurate, and such a decision would generally be of better quality. The more decisions a team can make for the method/procedure while completing the task, the more the team go away feel responsible for achieving success in something they own. Because it is then the property of team, the quality of the outturn may increase, as it is a direct mirror image of the team and its members (Lawler, 1992). This situation is very often to seen, erstwhile the teams decision is accepted by supervisors, the team members pull up stakes automatically show their better performance and try to achieve higher levels of success. In short, outcomes will have better quality (generated through teamwork), if each member is willing to participate in the decision-making. Work impression diversity Another factor that might help teams to perf orm at high level is workforce diversity. There is evidence that a diverse workforce has better-quality solutions on brainstorming tasks, display more cooperative behaviour, relative to homogenous groups, and can raise organizational efficiency, effectiveness and profitability (McLeod, Lobel and Cox, 1996 Wilson and Iles 1999). When you have a diversity of team members, a divergent active occurs. There is a greater chance of creativity, perspective, talents and universe coming out. The author assumes that the potential advantage of forming a group of individuals with varied backgrounds has a diverse hardening is likely to be highly successful than individuals work alone.If you keep on doing what you always did then you will keep on getting what you always got. No organization wants to be caught up in this trap. more(prenominal) of the essence(predicate)ly, innovation is the key for an organisation to stand in the market. In this case, the author assumes that the potential adv antage of forming a diverse team is that it is more likely to be highly successful than individuals working alone. Reason teamwork does not happen automatically In most cases, teamwork is beneficial to business operation and problem solving. However, it cannot be utter that teamwork happens perfectly and automatically.There are several factors that can cause a team to have refuse performance levels. Loss of self-motivation Lack of self-motivation could be a major factor that prevents a team from perform at high levels automatically. The author believes that individual self-motivation is an all key(p) requirement for high productivity, efficiency and quality organizational output. On the contrary, when a team members suggestion is rejected, he or she might commend they do not need my contribution, so I will not come up with new ideas some(prenominal) more. Consequently, the individuals motivation will be reduced and conflicts may arise.Since individual self-motivation and pr ovince are reduced, he or she will not be able to share more information or even put more social movement into the common task. For example, I used to work in a company that just started running a new system, as a team leader I had lots of experience in this system. I discovered the potential problems in running the new system, but when I put forward my suggestions to the manager, the ideas were rejected. afterwards that, I did not give them any suggestions any more. As my self-motivation was destroyed, I left that job after 6 months.In this case, it is easier to discover that when individual necessitate and responsibilities are reduced, people will not be able to put in the same labor for the common task the team can be modify by showing worse and worse performance. Lack of season control Another reason that a team can not perform automatically at high level is that people have several(predicate) levels of clock time management skill. This core individual time management skill will not match automatically when they come together as a team. There is an old aphorism in business world, time is money.When there is a blast, it takes a longer time to demote the cause of the fire when a whole team of firemen are assigned this task. It will be faster and more efficient to use one expert fire investigator. For instance, there is an urgent task which has to be done in a specific time. The team leader has to explain to the team members first, then announces the goal and deadline, and next, asks for solutions, followed by discussion of the solutions. In the end, an agreement is reached and action is taken. If any procedure takes a longer time, then the total task will not be sin slight on time.Or, people may waste a lot of time on disputes and lose multitude of the deadline. If the task is only required to be set up by an individual, then the time for announcement, discussion will be skipped. Plus, individuals can make decisions quicker than teams, speci ally if output from someone is not necessary to reach the objective. Therefore, deficiency of time management skill could be considered one of the major causes of a team cannot perform effectively automatically. Inappropriate use of the team approach Some jobs are not designed for teamwork.This is specially true for some individuals that have the expert knowledge necessary to be used in current tasks. These jobs require in open work, without the existence of team dynamics. One may be pressurized to adhere to lower labor norms than they would like to avoid cosmos ostracized (Hick & Gullett, 1985). They may not have the desire to put effort and time into achieving team goals, or they might have different perceptions of the work-pace and how the goal should be accomplished. Sometimes people may feel pressured to agree with team processes and decisions, that they do not agree with. In addition, not all individuals in the work force note value intrinsic rewards and a sense of achie vement. Neither do some value the prospect a team provides of learning and broaden skills (Lawler, 1992). This normally happens in unskilled workers that do not expect self-fulfillment and growth. Contrary to the view that routinzed and insistent jobs lead to boredom and job dissatisfaction, some workers find them suitable or even desirable (Chung & Ross, 1977,p. 119) To force these unskilled workers to participate in a team can put pressure on individual work together with other team members in planning or problem solving.It will substantially create stress for them and cause conflicts within the team. Conflicts lead to miscommunication and misunderstandings which will have a negative effect on performance. Therefore, teams will not be performing at high level if the job does not need teamwork. Social Loafing Lack of accountability could be one of the biggest destroyers for a high performance team. The definition of social faineance from BusinessDictionary. com shows Tendency of certain members of a group to get by with less effort than what they would have put when working alone.Since the counselling of productivity shifts from the individual to the group, it is difficult to detect individuals output for the group project or task. Some employees sometimes feel dragged down by poor or lazy team members and may find themselves doing a tremendous beat of work to compensate for weaker colleagues. In this no winner no loser situation, if no one takes responsibility for their own job or even doesnt know what should be done, then the project will be delayed and teamwork performance will be affected by those social loafer.For instance, there was a product which our company needed to be delivered by the next working day in another city for a trade show, but the goods were not allocated to a specific person. As a result, everyone view someone else would do it, but actually nobody delivered the item. The result is obvious that we complained about the delivery serve up and stopped using their delivery service after that. The example shows the common problems in teamwork and hence lack of responsibility is an issue in team work, which will affect team performance, and customer satisfaction. DiscussionIn most cases, high levels of team performance will not be achieved automatically. It depends largely on the motives and intentions of the individuals within the team. The author has identified that the major factors that lead to team ineffectiveness are communication breakdowns leading to release of confidence and form magnitude productivity, wasted resources and effort, ill-will/bad feelings/decreased in morale, failing to fix problems and improve processes, press release of focus on customers and profits, increase study conflict, increased job-related stress/workplace tension and setting s a poor example for the work force.However, its important to realize that the discipline of effective working relationships among mental faculty is a gradual process which requires considerable time and skill, this is not meant to discourage team members, but to help them realize that teams arent created overnight (Francis, 1979 p. 261). A certain amount of frustration and conflict is normal. From study and researching, the author thinks orgiansations can improve team performance from these aspects. First of all, set a clear goal for the team assignment, which will be accepted and understood by all members. Clear goal will keep team focused, thus avoiding the divisive potential of political issues and individual agendas(Larson & etc. 1989). When individuals fully understand their responsibility in achieving the same end, a tremendous synergy will be created. Secondly, take advantage of effective communication that also will contribute to a superior team. Many times, decisions take a long time to be reached due to communication bottlenecks, but in a team where communication is rapid and prompt, any delay that may arise is mi nimized (Rees, 2001, p. 15).When team members communicate with one another by using words or actions, team members come closer together and resolve any misunderstanding in the group. Next, rewarding or punishing team members found on team performance can be a strategy to motivate teams to perform at a high level. Rewards and punishments send a powerful message to organisational members. (Robbins & Barnwell, 2006, p. 417) In this way, the individual will settle more attention to their performance and value in the team. Last but not least, team size also affects team performance, on Daglows law of team Dynamics Small teams are informed.Big teams suppose smaller teams demonstrated to have better team-work (Ziller, 1957 p. 165-173 Steiner, 1966 p. 273-283). Team size is an important determinant of the social loafing phenomenon, whereby individuals decrease their effort as the number of people in the group increases. Team size must be determined with respect to both staffing requir ements, derived from the size of the project task and teamwork requirements, derived from task complexity and uncertainness (Hoegl et al. , 2003 p. 281-302). In conclusion, better team performance is reachable. The way we put people and jobs together and define their roles and relationships is an important determinant in whether an organization is successful. (Robbins & Barnwell, 2006, p. 73) The acceptance and success of a team approach is high dependent on abilities, attitudes, motivations, and social and physical environments required or designed by the individuals bear on(Dawson, 1996). Future studies should focus on the ways teams change over time. Job design will become more and more important in the workplace for enhancing the motivation of the employees, which gives rise to high productivity and efficiency.Perhaps, different measures of effectiveness could be studied. Also various group design characteristics are more applicable in teams that have been functioning longer than in younger teams or groups that have been recently established. More also needs to be known about how to design jobs to promote higher performance levels when teams are being set up or are impudently established. Reference Social loafing. (2009, Aug 22) In BusinessDictionary ,The BusinessDictonary Retrieve on Aug 22, 2009 from http//www. businessdictionary. om/definition/social-loafing. html Chung, K. H. , & Ross, M. F. (1977). Differences in Motivational Properties among Job Enlargement and Job Enrichment. Academy of caution Review, 2, 1, 113-122. Cooper, R. (1974). Job Motivation & Job Design. London institute of Personnel direction. Dawson, S. (1996). Analysing Organisatons (3rd ed. ). London Macmillan Press Ltd. De Janasz, S. C. , Dowd K. O. , & Schneider B. Z. (2002). Interpersonal Skills in Organizations. New York McGraw-Hill. pp. 309-329. FRANCIS, D. & Young, D. 1979.Improving Work chemical groups A serviceable Manual for Team Building, La Jolla, California Univer sity Associates. pp. 261. Hicks, H. G. , & Gullett, C. R. (1985). Management (4th ed. ) Singapore McGraw-Hill, Inc. HOEGL, M. PARBOTEEAH, K. P. , & GEMUENDEN, H. G. When teamwork really matters Task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamworkperformance relationship in software development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003, pp. 281-302. Larson, C. , LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA,. Lawler, E. E. (1986).High-involvement Management. San FranciscoJossey-Bass Publishers, Inc. Lawler, E. E. (1992). The net Advantage creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc. McLeod, P. L. Lobel, S. A. and Cox, T. H. , Ethnic diversity and creativity in small group, Small Group Research, Vol. 27(2), 1996, 248-64. Rees, F. (2001). How to lead work teams Facilitation skills. 2nd Edition. San Diego Pfeiffer & Company. Robbins, S. P. , & Barnwell, N. S. (2006). giving medication theory Concepts a nd cases (5th ed. ). French Frost, NSW.Pearson procreation Australia Pty Ltd. Sashkin, M. , (1994). , The New Teamwork, Amercian Management Association, New York, NY. , Scarnati James T. On becoming a team player. Team instruction execution Management. Vol. 7 (1/2), 2001, p5-10 Sinclair, A. The tyranny of a team ideology. Organisation Studies, 13, 4, 1992, p611-626. Zaleznik, A. & Moment, D. (1964). The Dynamics of Interpersonal Behavior. New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ziller, Robert. C. 1957. Group size A determinant of the quality and stableness of group decisions. Amercian Sociological Association, p. 165-173.